lexisnexisip.com

Committee publications

  • Subject
  • Region
  • Year
Employment agreement and non-compete clauses: topical issues to consider in Nigeria

Over the years, there has been an issue on the validity and enforceability of non-compete clauses in employment contracts in Nigeria. The traditional and longstanding view is that these clauses restrict the employees fundamental rights including the employees’ right to freedom of association and right to earn a living, thereby impacting on their right to have a quality life. One of the effects of this, is that, it stifles mobility of labour and restricts the employee’s right to work. There is, however, a growing recognition that non-compete clauses may serve to protect the legitimate and reasonable investment of employers. The question, however, remains as to the factors to be considered in determining the reasonability of the non-compete clause.

Released on Aug 27, 2024

Innovative solutions and regulatory challenges: technology’s role in labour law

This article explores how technological improvements serve as tools to bring people closer together, optimise resources and provide solutions in an interconnected world. The combination of technological advancement and the lack of legal regulation has led lawyers to reconsider their role in a changing world, striving to fully comply with the law while offering efficient methods for their clients.

Released on Aug 27, 2024

Employee mobility restrictions: a review of India’s sustained approach at restraining the restraint, in light of global trends on non-compete bans

Trends across the globe reflect a measured approach at limiting enforceability of post-separation non-competes in the context of workforce management. Growing voices against strangling of labour mobility under the garb of confidentiality and non-compete is being seen with immense distaste in employment rights movements. Several countries have demonstrated significant developments on banning non-compete in certain circumstances. India, however, has historically maintained a sustained approach at barring enforceability of post-separation non-competes, subject to limited exceptions. This article discusses these growing trends against non-competes, its limitations and jurisprudence in India, and popular alternate strategies adopted in practice to legally protect business interests.

Released on Aug 27, 2024

Banning non-competes: lessons from Ontario, Canada?

Do laws which ban employee non-compete agreements actually work to foster innovation and growth? The real-world experiment over the past several years in Canada’s largest province may offer some insights. Ontario has, since late 2021, had legislation in effect which prohibits employers with Ontario-based employees from signing non-competition agreements with most employees. When the current Ontario provincial government passed these rules, they claimed that this would lead to greater mobility among employees, and a legal and human resources environment which would attract more skilled and mobile workers.

Released on Aug 27, 2024

Is employment law keeping pace with technology? The rise of digital nomads and the challenges faced by tech disrupters

This article analyses the restrictions that current employment law constructs can apply to harnessing a diverse and creative workforce essential to creating new digital technologies and ideas.

Released on Aug 27, 2024

Chile moves to reduce the maximum work week, but many doubts remain

The reduction of the maximum workweek in Chile has been expected by all parties alongside the country’s economic stability and growth. However, the approval of Law 25.561 – which enforced such a change – has created unexpected questions regarding exempt employees and other forms of modern work which have not yet been answered by the authorities.

Released on Aug 27, 2024

Employment and ESG awareness: a new way to promote fundamental rights?

ESG factors are increasingly relevant in today’s work and social environment. Italian legislators are more and more attentive to adapting to the new priorities established by the evolving economic and organisational landscape. However, this process has led to various approaches. Health, safety and sustainability measures in the workplace rely heavily on current regulations and their interpretation by the courts and operators. Meanwhile, new rules have been implemented to promote sustainable mobility and gender equality. This requires companies to exercise additional compliance efforts, while some incentives are provided in the latter case.

Released on Aug 27, 2024

Australia’s new laws: more and stronger employee and union rights – adapting to changes in ways of working

Recent Australian employment and industrial law reforms. Facilitating collective bargaining, enhancing union power and influence, and the rights of union delegates. The changes in the economic and organisational environment and new ways of working: flexible work, gig workers, casual employment, fixed-term employment, labour hire and right to disconnect.

Released on Aug 27, 2024

Borderless workforce and global mobility: Indian legal considerations

The landscape of the workplace is evolving due to the meteoric rise of remote work and a globalised talent pool in the last few years. The benefits of a borderless workforce working remotely without geographical restraints extend to both organisations and the workforce alike. Organisations are able to access a global pool of talent whereas the workforce appreciate the freedom and flexibility to work from anywhere. Indian employment laws, though technical, offer a fair amount of flexibility for engaging a foreign workforce in India or vice versa when sending an Indian workforce abroad. However, organisations should certainly have a clear understanding of employment law, social security, tax, exchange control and immigration law requirements before moving forward. A legally thought through approach goes a long way in mitigating risks and treading the right path with greater awareness.

Released on Aug 27, 2024

The UK perspective on the FTC ban on US non-competes

The Federal Trade Commission recently announced a complete ban on non-competes in the US on the basis that they are contrary to competition laws. This article revisits the operation of non-competes in the UK and explores the UK’s previous proposals in relation to non-compete reforms, as well as the UK Consumer and Markets Authority’s views on such provisions. We consider whether we are likely to see a similar ban in the UK in the near future and explore alternative ways that employers can protect their confidential information if they are prevented from using (or choose not to use) non-compete provisions.

Released on Aug 27, 2024

Privilege, penalties and good faith across jurisdictions

The focus of this conference panel discussion was privilege, penalties and good faith across jurisdictions. The panel discussed a hypothetical tax enforcement lifecycle, client–attorney privilege protection, the interaction between civil and criminal law proceedings, as well as document retention rules.

Released on Aug 26, 2024

Transfer pricing in a post-Pillar Two world

The panel discussed the role of transfer pricing (TP) in the post-Pillar Two tax world, focusing in particular on the potential impact of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Pillar Two rules on TP (section 1); recent developments at European Union level involving the proposed EU Directive on Transfer Pricing (commonly known as the ‘TP Directive’), recent intellectual property fact patterns (section 3) and the current trends in intercompany financing (section 4).

Released on Aug 26, 2024

Multijurisdictional audits: mutual agreement procedure and advance pricing agreement issues

This conference panel explored multijurisdictional trends, including the frequency of multijurisdictional audits, the use of a mutual agreement procedure, advance pricing agreement trends, the use of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s International Compliance Assurance Programme and developments related to information sharing.

Released on Aug 26, 2024

Plenary session: government update

This government update explored the implementation of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Two-Pillar Solution through several lenses, ranging from work currently being conducted by the OECD and the European Commission, to the country-specific perspectives of Germany, Jersey, Switzerland and the United States.

Released on Aug 26, 2024

Direct and indirect taxes and supply chains

This conference panel discussed the main hurdles faced by a non-EU based company importing and selling goods in the EU via a traditional buy-and-sell or a limited-risk distribution model.

Released on Aug 26, 2024

Inbound investments into the United States

This conference panel discussed the complexities surrounding investment in the US through hybrid entities, providing diverse perspectives on the matter, whereby each speaker offered insights into recent developments concerning these entities in their respective jurisdictions.

Released on Aug 26, 2024

Citizens of the world: navigating the labyrinth of special tax regimes

This conference panel discussed special tax regimes in various jurisdictions. The speakers presented the latest news from their home jurisdictions and addressed the tax residency criteria, changes to the tax laws and the implications for taxpayers. They also touched on treaty issues and concluded with predictions on future trends in international tax policies.

Released on Aug 26, 2024

Maritime and Transport Law Committee – From the Co-Chairs – August 2024

A note from the Co-Chairs of the IBA Maritime and Transport Law Committee, Ulla von Weissenberg and Henrik Hagberg.

Released on Aug 19, 2024

Maritime and Transport Law Committee – From the Editors – August 2024

Note from the Editors of the IBA Maritime and Transport Law Committee, Jim Bercaw and Müge Anber-Kontakis.

Released on Aug 19, 2024

Meet the Officer: Tom Belknap

An interview with Tom Belknap, Co-Vice Chair of the IBA Maritime and Transport Law Committee and a partner at Blank Rome, New York.

Released on Aug 19, 2024

Navigating the EU ETS Regulation in Denmark

On 1 January 2024, shipping was included into the existing Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) regulation – also known as the ‘cap and trade’ system. This article provides an overview of the most important aspects and insight into how the regulation will be administered in Denmark.

Released on Aug 19, 2024

UK Supreme Court construes a contractual war risks regime in general average disputes

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom recently provided useful guidance on the interpretation of War Risks provisions. It is particularly timely in view of ongoing geopolitical risks around the world.

Released on Aug 19, 2024

Effects of sanctions against Russian marine insurers: certification of insurers (Blue Card) according to the CLC 92, Nairobi and Bunker Convention

Various sanction regimes imposed against Russia raise unresolved questions about the certifications of Russian marine insurers, more precisely their issued Blue Cards under the Civil Liability Convention of 1992 (CLC 92), the Bunkers Convention of 2001 (Bunkers Convention) and the Nairobi International Convention on the Removal of Wrecks, 2007 (Nairobi Convention, sometimes collectively referred to as ‘the Conventions’), if in the case of an event triggering the scope of application of the conventions, a Russian insurer can no longer meet its insurance obligation due to, for example, banking sanctions. This brief article addresses this problem, which also occupied the Legal Committee of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) on 22 and 23 March 2022.

Released on Aug 19, 2024

The Russian oil price cap, 'shadow fleet' and environment

The maritime transportation of Russian oil has become a massive hurdle for traders and their service providers due to the sanctions and reputational risks, as well as for the global community due to environmental hazards. This article is about the Russian oil Price Cap, the ‘shadow-fleet’ and their impact on the environment globally. The article starts with the hypotheticals and the relevant questions, followed by briefly describing the Price Cap regulation and its enforcement policy, and concluding by answering those questions raised first in relation to the hypotheticals.

Released on Aug 19, 2024

Progression in Philippine maritime law: opening the gates via the Amended Public Service Act

The Philippines has made repeated moves to open up its economy and liberalise industries in the name of development and foreign investments. Thus, the Public Service Act has finally been amended. This is the breakthrough that supposedly a lot of industries have been waiting for, the shipping industry included. This article aims to give a glimpse into what may lie ahead for shipping and its related businesses.

Released on Aug 19, 2024

Survey introduction: Maritime and Transport Law Committee

An introduction to the Committee’s survey to members asking for an article on their country's public policy exceptions.

Released on Aug 19, 2024

Ratification procedure for international conventions in Brazil

Although the ratification procedure for international conventions is a matter regulated in accordance with the legal system of each country, there are, as a rule, two models of procedures for carrying out the analysis of international conventions with a view to their subsequent ratification.

Released on Aug 19, 2024

Local public policy exceptions in India to the enforcement of international conventions or treaties

Previously in India, three separate provisions, that is, the Arbitration Act 1940, Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act 1937 and Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act 1961, formed the legislative framework for domestic and international arbitration. Later, these laws were repealed and a single act (for both international and domestic arbitration), known as the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (the 'Act'), was enacted.

Released on Aug 19, 2024

Public policy-based exception to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Korea

This article explores the law of Korea regarding the public policy exception to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Korea. Korea is a signatory to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 (the 'New York Convention').

Released on Aug 19, 2024

Ordre public as a bar to recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions and arbitral awards in Norway

In Norway, the recognition and enforcement of both court decisions and arbitral awards are subject to the ordre public restriction. This legal principle serves as a safeguard to prevent the recognition and enforcement of foreign decisions that would be contrary to fundamental principles of the Norwegian legal system.

Released on Aug 19, 2024