IBA Annual Conference Paris 2023

29 Oct - 3 Nov 2023

Room 252 A&B, Level 2

Session information

A taste of hot topics
Room 252 A&B, Level 2

Committee(s)

Intellectual Property, Communications and Technology Section (Lead)
Art, Cultural Institutions and Heritage Law Committee
Communications Law Committee
Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Committee
Media Law Committee
Space Law Committee
Technology Law Committee

Description

This very dynamic and well-attended session enables you to select from a menu of hot topics in intellectual property, communication, media and technology sectors and participate in roundtable discussions. Topics of current interest are selected to stimulate a lively debate. Moderators on each table introduce the table topic and the participants do the rest. Background knowledge or experience within areas for discussion is not required. Our menu will include hot and "late-breaking" topics in the areas of intellectual property law, internet law and mobile technology, privacy and data protection, technology contracting and dispute resolution, arts law, media and space law. Discussion is usually around the interface of law, business, technology and culture, with a global focus. Many topics for discussion are often the subject of considerable public and media interest. In participating in the table topics, you will gain a deeper insight into these areas and be able to add your own comments. The format of the session is interactive networking. It will provide you with a great opportunity to meet many other lawyers and to discuss topics of mutual interest with them: please, do not forget your business cards and e-cards.

 

 
1. Moral rights 

‘Who’s afraid of droit moral?' Paris might be the birthplace of the moral rights of the author enjoying copyright protection but the concept is worldwide and enshrined in the Berne Convention. In some anglo-saxon jurisdictions a complete waiver of moral rights is sought. The panel will discuss the effect of such waivers, with specific focus on contracts in the entertainment and software industry. 

 

2. Distinct politics – politicians using music, names signs and logos 

Political parties and politicians also need to distinguish themselves by using names, signs, music and slogans, the panel will address how the IP law and public policies ruling the political campaigns are coherent or increases the chances of conflicts of laws and whether or not the actual conflicts could be solved?

 

3. Generative AI 

Generative AI systems pose intriguing questions to society and law. According to ChatGPT the current legal issues “include intellectual property rights, liability for AI-generated content, data privacy and security, transparency and explainability of AI systems, and ethical considerations such as bias and discrimination. Additionally, there are ongoing discussions around whether AI-generated works should be eligible for copyright protection and who should be held responsible for any potential harm caused by AI systems.” At the round table these topics, and especially copyright, data privacy and (product) liability, will be discussed. 
 


4. Emerging technologies and AI in healthcare and life sciences – IP, legal and ethical consequences

To discuss the legal, IP, regulatory and ethical implications and consequences arising out of the use of generative AI tools in the healthcare and life sciences areas. Generative AI is evolving rapidly with the release of ChatGPT, Bard, Claude, etc. As exciting as this technology sounds in terms of the endless opportunities, it poses a number of challenges, especially in the area of medicine, healthcare, life sciences and ownership of IP rights. This roundtable proposes to discuss all these aspects and more. 

 

5. The Importance of IP in the protection of traditional Knowledge and cultural expressions 

Traditional knowledge (TK) refers to the accumulated knowledge, innovations, and practices developed and preserved by indigenous communities and local cultures over generations.  

Traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) are the manifestations of traditional knowledge, folklore, and cultural heritage that are deeply rooted in the cultural and social identities of indigenous communities and traditional societies.  

Genetic Resources instead refers to material found in plants, animals, and microorganisms that possess genetic information of potential value.  

This session will focus on the intersection between Intellectual Property (IP), Traditional Knowledge, and Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs) Participants are invited to share and exchange views on  these issues including the protection of traditional medicine, appellations of origin, geographical indications and collective marks.

 

6. AI and the law: navigating the legal landscape of artificial intelligence with a media focus 

There are several legal issues that arise from the use of artificial intelligence (AI), including: 

  • Liability: One of the main legal issues with AI is who is responsible if an AI system causes harm. Should it be the designer or developer of the AI system, the owner of the system, or the user of the system? 
  • Intellectual Property: AI can create new inventions and works of art that may raise questions about who owns the intellectual property rights. For example, who owns the copyright to a song written by an AI system? 
  • Privacy: AI systems can collect and process vast amounts of personal data, which raises questions about data protection and privacy. 
  • Discrimination: There is a risk that AI systems can reinforce existing biases and discrimination in society. This raises questions about how to ensure that AI is developed and used in a fair and non-discriminatory manner. 
  • Regulation: The rapid pace of technological change in the AI field means that existing regulations may not be adequate. This raises questions about how to regulate AI in a way that promotes innovation while also protecting public safety and other important values.

 

7. Recent developments in space law 

  • On tourism in space.
  • Ethics in space.
  • Debris mitigation. 

Special areas:

  • Dispute resolution.
  • Arbitration for space law. 
  • Space areas for dispute – ideas of solving them.

 

8. Copying anterior art work(s)

  • Comment on the Warhol US Supreme court ruling and other jurisdictions rules.

What is a fake in art (and law)?  

  • A new law is currently discussed in France and other jurisdictions rules.

 

9. Open banking 

At the crossroads of technology and financial regulation, open banking promises to change the way we interact with money, helping consumers gain better control and financial freedom through more flexible financial services powered by technological innovation.

Open banking, as a set of technologies, provides a method for an authorized party (like a fintech) to access a customer’s financial information (like its bank account) in the same way that the authorizing customer can, whether it is by looking at the information, or initiating payments on behalf of the customer.

The way in which countries have dealt with the regulatory challenges of this fast-changing environment is vastly different, and the success of any legal design over another to support the growth of this market while fostering financial inclusion and protecting consumers privacy is still yet to be determined.

This roundtable seeks to discuss:

  • What is open banking.
  • Regulatory driven and industry driven approaches to open banking.
  • Evolution from open banking to open finance to open data.
  • New capabilities of APIs, beyond payments.
  • Points to consider when advising FinTech companies in the open banking sector.
  • Privacy challenges on the implementation of an open banking environment.

 

10. Learning to be lawful: Understanding Competition Law in an Algorithmic Era

Implications of algorithms in terms of competition liability and the use of more advanced (i.e. machine learning) algorithms have been heavily debated since the publication of the final report on the E-commerce sector inquiry in May 2017 in the EU. Although the topic has been popular among scholars, there have been a scarcity of case law since then. However it seems that competition authorities have started picking up on harms to competition (and consumers) arising from algorithmic systems again. For example, in the paper that was published in 2021, the Competition Market Authority (UK) (CMA) reminded that they will 'monitor developments in the application of machine learning … to ensure that they do not lead to anti-competitive behaviour or consumer detriment' as part of the new ex-ante regime for digital markets. Recently the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) also decided that the technology platforms, Naver and Kakao, engaged in an unlawful algorithm manipulation.  In these cases the KFTC have also tested their abilities to detect and prove anticompetitive effects of algorithms.  

Some of the issues we propose to discuss:  

  • The role of algorithms in anti-competitive practices (e.g. algorithmic collusion, exclusionary practices) and the main legal questions they pose for practitioners (e.g. liability).  
  • The reasons of why there have been only a few cases on anticompetitive use of algorithms and whether KFTC's decisions can potentially turn the tide.  
  • Advising clients on mitigation of risk associated with the use of algorithms. 

 

11. AI and data privacy / sports and e-sports data 

This round table would look at the treatment of personal data in the context of sports and e-sports, focussing on Project Red Card and claims that data companies are using players' personal data without the right to do so.  Speakers from the UK and one other jurisdiction (possibly North American) will outline arguments for and against the rights of players – and the interests of data, betting and gaming and e-sports companies.  With sports data at the core of huge business valuations, might data rights (rather than IP rights in databases) be the next battlefield? 

Advising clients on mitigation of risk associated with the use of algorithms. 

 

12. Auditing AI - How to address the risks of bias and discrimination in your AI tools 

As AI becomes more sophisticated, companies are increasingly relying on it to power everything from enterprise systems to marketing campaigns. However, several companies have been burned by AI products that have been released into the public and later demonstrated bias or discriminatory results (who remembers Microsoft’s Twitter chatbot?). In addition to the potential for legal liability, AI bias can also result in brand and reputational damage. To stay ahead of these issues, companies should be implementing programs to audit the use of AI in their tools.  In this roundtable, we will discuss the regulations and guidelines we can leverage to create frameworks for auditing AI,  the key stakeholders who should have a role in the process, and the checkpoints and checklists that companies are leveraging to help their teams understand how to identify and address these risks. 

 

13. Global tech legal showdown 

This session will look at the trends in global technology disputes with regional expert commentary into current litigation in UK, EU, US, Australia and Asia (Latam could also be included). The session will also provide some useful legal and practical insights for non-litigators –commercial tech lawyers on how to minimize the risk of their tech agreements being subjected to regulatory or court scrutiny.

 

14. Transactions in the Metaverse

  • Same as in a “traditional” Internet environment?  
  • How to best protect “ownership”.  
  • Use of NFTs.  

Participant to the roundtable may expect to get a better understanding of the differences between transactions in the Metaverse and traditional transactions, including under the legal, operational and commercial angles. Also, the question of forum shopping is of a renewed acute nature, since transactions in the Metaverse are likely to see various Courts, in various countries, rule that they have jurisdiction over these cases, which is likely to lead to new difficulties. Participants will discuss how to tackle these aspects, after having also laid out the various use cases of NFTs. 

By engaging with experts and discussing these issues with other participants, they will be able to identify potential solutions to these challenges and gain a better understanding of how to navigate them.  Overall, the roundtable provides an opportunity for participants to deepen their knowledge of the metaverse and NFTs from a legal and operational perspective, learn about best practices, and network with other professionals in the field. 

 

15. Digital market act and digital service act: a blueprint for global digital regulation 

This table will discuss new EU legislation that has been adopted, and that is still in proposal stage, as part of the EU Digital Single Market and Digital Decade strategies, with an emphasis not only on risks but also opportunities, and the challenges presented to in-house lawyers. Laws discussed would include the DSA, DMA and AI Act, but also lesser-known laws like the Platform Work Directive and the proposals regarding product liability.

 


16. Low Earth orbit satellite services to rule the world?

LEO satellite constellations have the potential to provide connectivity in geographic areas which are hard to reach with fixed and terrestrial mobile infrastructure and also to provide services in jurisdictions with limited infrastructure. However, the operators of satellite constellations potentially face numerous legal challenges before they could be seen as significant competitors to terrestrial telecommunications infrastructure providers. Satellite constellations are subject to complex spectrum allocation, filing and coordination proceedings at international level and, subsequently, also to national spectrum assignment proceedings in order to become operational and enter the market. National security and cyber security risks, as well as potential requirements to comply with existing telecommunications infrastructure regulation, are also issues to be considered by LEO satellite operators and service providers.

 

Session / Workshop Chair(s)

Elisa Henry WSP Global Inc, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Vice Chair, Technology Law Committee
Eileen O'Gorman Gleeson McGrath Baldwin Solicitors, Dublin, Ireland; Senior Vice Chair, Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Committee

Speakers

Karen Abraham Shearn Delamore & Co., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Webinar Officer, Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Committee
Julia Apostle Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Paris, France
Robert Balin Davis Wright Tremaine, New York, New York, USA
Anna Beke-Martos Law Office of Dr Anna Beke-Martos, Budapest, Hungary; Treasurer, Media Law Committee
Docia Agyemang Boakye Bank of Ghana, Accra, Ghana; Vice Chair, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Subcommittee
Giuseppe Calabi CBM & Partners Studio Legale, Milan, Italy
Bob Calmes Arendt & Medernach, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg; Diversity and Inclusion Officer, Space Law Committee
Nazar Chernyavsky Sayenko Kharenko, Kyiv, Ukraine; Senior Vice Chair, Technology Law Committee
Herman Croux MVVP, Brussels, Belgium; Member, Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Committee Advisory Board
Steve Crown Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA
Raphaël Dana Dana Associés, Paris, France; Vice Chair, Fintech Subcommittee
Laurent De Muyter Jones Day, Brussels, Belgium; Co-Chair, Communications Law Committee
Pascal Dutru Ministry of Communication and IT, Doha, Qatar; Co-Vice Chair, Forum for Government and Public Lawyers
Angela Flannery Quay Law Partners, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Vice Chair, Communications Law Committee
Larissa Galimberti Pinheiro Neto Advogados, São Paulo, Brazil; Vice Chair, Data Law Subcommittee
Katharina Garbers-von Boehm Büsing Müffelmann & Theye, Berlin, Germany; Senior Vice Chair, Art, Cultural Institutions and Heritage Law Committee
Julian Hamblin Trethowans, Southampton, England; Vice Chair, Technology Law Committee
Norman Heckh LL.M. Ramon y Cajal Abogados, Madrid, Spain; Vice Chair, Fintech Subcommittee
Hein Hobbelen Bird & Bird LLP, Brussels, Belgium
Professor Niko Härting HÄRTING Rechtsanwälte, Berlin, Germany
Luca Iaboni Alpeggiani Avvocati Associati, Milano, Italy; Website Officer, Space Law Committee
Nazli Cansin Karga Dentons, Glasgow, Scotland; Membership Officer - Young Lawyers, Technology Law Committee
Vik Khurana Bristows, London, England; Vice Chair, Data Law Subcommittee
Katarina Klaric Stephens Lawyers & Consultants, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Vice Chair, Technology Disputes Subcommittee
Mark Kuehn RITTERSHAUS, Frankfurt, Germany; Chair, Fintech Subcommittee
Jessica Lee Loeb & Loeb, New York, New York, USA; Chair, Cybersecurity Subcommitee
Jose Alejandro Luna Fandino Olivares, Mexico City, Mexico; Co-Chair, Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Committee
Andrew Lustigman Olshan Frome Wolosky, New York, New York, USA
Sean Murray Knobbe Martens Olson and Bear LLP, Irvine, California, USA
Njeri Mutura Microsoft Corporation, Irvine, California, USA
Grace Nacimiento GvW Graf von Westphalen, Düsseldorf, Germany; Member, Space Law Advisory Board
Takashi Nakasaki Anderson Mōri & Tomotsune, Tokyo, Japan
Gloria Niembro Chevez Ruiz Zamarripa, Mexico City, Mexico
Elysangela Rabelo Rabelo Law, São Paulo, Brazil; Vice Chair, Life Sciences Subcommittee
Salvador Rodriguez Artacho Hernandez-Echevarria Abogados, Madrid, Spain; Vice Chair, Space Law Committee
Florencia Rosati Beccar Varela, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Vice Chair, Technology Disputes Subcommittee
Anne Rose Mishcon de Reya, London, England
Adam Rose Mishcon de Reya, London, England; Chair, Data Law Subcommittee
Steven R Schindler Schindler Cohen & Hochman, New York, New York, USA; Treasurer, Art, Cultural Institutions and Heritage Law Committee
Sofía Serrat Vallespín Grupo Santander, Madrid, Spain
Paulina Silva Bitlaw, Santiago, Chile; Publications Officer, Technology Law Committee
Doil Son Yulchon LLC, Seoul, South Korea; Co-Chair, Technology Law Committee
Deepa Tiku K&S Partners, Gurgaon, Haryana, India; Diversity and Inclusion Officer, Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Committee
Amrish Tiwari K&S Partners, New Delhi, Delhi, India; Chair, Life Sciences Subcommittee
Anne Vallery WilmerHale, Brussels, Belgium; Member, Communications Law Committee Advisory Board
Yaél Weitz Kaye Spiegler PLLC, New York, New York, USA
Laura Yvonne Zielinski Holland & Knight, Mexico City, Mexico; Newsletter Officer, Space Law Committee