A “SLAPP” suit is a “strategic lawsuit against public participation,” with the asserted purpose of attempting to silence freedom of expression by subjecting the speaker to an expensive and intimidating lawsuit. To this extent, protection of freedom of expression is seen in the human rights context. On the other hand, freedom of expression had never been absolute; other interests, such as protection of reputation from defamation, must also be balanced. As various governments have enacted or are being considered “Anti-SLAPP” statutes or regulations, designed to offer protection to preserve public dialog on newsworthy issues, there have also been instances of abuse. The issue crosses common law and civil law boundaries, and in some jurisdictions may have criminal law implications. The panel will discuss these issues in substantive terms and address the challenges facing bar associations in their role as defenders of the rule of law for their diverse constituencies.