Conference programme

This panel will cover issues on construction, management and transactions, coverage regulatory aspects, and litigations.

This panel will discuss the impact of the change of leadership in the United States, Canada and Mexico, on the review of the North American’s free trade agreement (the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement), scheduled in 2026. The previous revision introduced ground breaking changes, including the thorough supervision of labour standards at a company level. What will the next revision bring? 

The panel will discuss the current state of domain name protection and what companies need to be thinking about over the next 25 years.

This session is organised to discuss possible role of lawyers in using law and legal procedures to broker peace talks/ bring war crimes to justice and related issues. 

This panel will address the tax implication of a change of the residency of individuals for both companies and the individuals, different regimes of exit taxation or deferral of taxation upon a move, dual residency, and tie breaker regimes as well as allocation issues.

The evidence shows that in most cases, and even where international arbitration disputes involve African parties, the seats for the international arbitration are likely to be London, Paris, New York or sometimes in Singapore with these cases being subject to either the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) or the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). Is there the need for African countries to consider strengthening their national legal systems and mechanisms for commercial dispute resolution for purposes international arbitration at least when the parties are all African?

The session will explore the feasibility of strengthening these national rules for commercial dispute resolution or consider the establishment of a regional hub with the necessary international standards and and credibility to absorb some of the disputes in the future.

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is revolutionising the IT ecosystem in unprecedented ways. With AI developers themselves struggling to fully understand the intricacies of their own model, AI’s inherent risks of unpredictability and bias pose challenges for lawyers and regulators alike. Regulators around the globe have responded with AI regulation but are also introducing new regulations that apply to technology contracting more broadly and which impact providers and users of technology in general. In this evolving landscape, companies need to re-evaluate their contracts. Are they still offering the right level of protection? Do the clauses function as intended? Do they address these new developments? The short answer is: likely not.

In this interactive session, leading industry experts and specialised lawyers will discuss the impact of AI and other regulations on contracts. Through real-world examples and contract clauses, they will guide you on how to update your contracts to meet the challenges ahead.

Forum shopping in insolvency proceedings—where debtors choose jurisdictions with favourable laws has sparked significant debate. Central to this is the Centre of Main Interests (COMI), which determines jurisdiction based on where the debtor regularly administers their interests.

Recent critiques highlight COMI's flaws, including inflexibility, susceptibility to manipulation, and uncertainty. Our experienced panellists will discuss recent and high-profile cross-border case law involving COMI, the strategies developed by stakeholders, and their impact on related restructuring and insolvency matters. They will also evaluate whether alternative concepts to COMI, as used by relevant courts, offer credible solutions or if they warrant criticism.

Whilst investigative journalists have often been instrumental in exposing cases of serious corruption, there are also many instances where this has not been the case. If individuals or businesses take action to protect their reputation from journalistic accusation, they are often accused of trying to ‘silence’ the media— is this a fair situation? Is the law positioned to, or capable of, adequately addressing these issues? Alternatively, does the law inhibit an open and free press, and are the impacts of investigative journalism overstated? The role of whistleblowers.

Is the situation in women’s boxing during the last Olympic Games a case of discrimination and harassment of female athletes, or are the allegations justified measures aimed at levelling the playing field in sports competition? This panel will also cover other current issues relating to women in sports and the associated legal implications: income (especially, how to accelerate equality), maternity, sexism, trolling.  

Mining is one of the most relevant industries in several Latin American countries. Over the recent years, regulations have increased and deals have become more sophisticated. Investments in the region need to deal with heavier regulatory requirements and increased competition. This panel will address some of the legal trends of the mining industry in the region considering energy transition aspects, the need of rare minerals, artificial intelligence, global climate effects and geopolitical concerns.

This session will focus on the IBA's ongoing and planned anti-corruption capacity building efforts, in collaboration with the International Federation of Accountants, and experts at the FATF. Come along to see how you can get involved in bespoke regional training events, and how the professions and other stakeholders are coming together to maximise the impact of these events. 

In this panel discussion we look at the growing role in non-bank financial institutions such as tech companies, credit funds, asset managers and insurers are playing in providing credit to the real economy and the financial sector. The panel will consider both opportunities and challenges this poses for the financial markets, including the impact it has on traditional players, how it might change both the mix of debt and the attractiveness of debt that is available (both private debt and public capital markets), and whether the rise of these alternative financiers poses a threat to financial stability. 

The international trade community is scrambling to recover and re-orient itself from the second Trump Administration's chaotic trade policy. It's January 2025 Inauguration Day "America First" Trade Policy, followed by multiple new tariff regimes, including the 2 April 2025 Liberation Day Reciprocity Tariffs, have altered unimaginably long-established multilateral and regional trade laws and norms. No country on earth is untouched by what has happened. 

Our expert panel will critically analyse (in a non-partisan, non-ad hominem manner) the implications of this policy for producer-exporters, buyer-importers, end-consumers, and governments. Does this policy spell the end of the GATT-WTO regime and major FTA relationships, such as USMCA (NAFTA 2.0)? Or, is it an opportunity to re-invigorate both, perhaps sans-America?
 
Our panel will focus on whether, how, and why (1) the blatant use of wholesale remedial tariffs that breach fundamental WTO principles and bound tariff obligations pose an existential threat to the rules based trading system, and (2) such tariffs may, paradoxically, catalyse a renewed interest around the world among governments and industry to re-dedicate themselves to GATT-WTO sanctioned trade remedies.
 
Our panel will address the perception that several high profile WTO disputes about the interpretation of trade remedy rules, especially those concerning AD, CVD, and safeguards, are insufficiently effective to deal with the trade practices of some WTO Members — such as industrial policy in China. Is that rationale, twinned with national security concerns, a justification for Trumpian tariff levies via unilateral trade remedies?
 
Our panel also will concentrate on how the lack of reforms for WTO rules (manifest in the failed Doha Round) has catalysed the evolution and mutation of trade remedies, and intensified their deployment, by key users. Whilst the WTO Dispute Settlement Body continues to generate important jurisprudence in defining and clarifying key concepts and parameters, there has been a surge of new forms of trade remedy tools – countervailing measures on cross-border subsidies, proliferation of “anti-circumvention” investigations, “particular market situation" inquiries, and — of course, America's use of its 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, and Section 30 of the Trade Act of 1974.
 
Are these legitimate responses to a vastly different trade world shaped by ever more powerful multinational corporations and state-backed industrial policies? Or are they regressive reactions that doom the liberalisation and development objectives of the founders of the 1947 GATT and 1995 WTO? Simply put, are trade remedies in a post-Liberation Day world a harbinger of a post-WTO world, a death knell for the multilateral trading system, or a welcome fillip for its reform?

An open committee business meeting where all members and Officers are invited to learn more about the current and upcoming activities and developments of the Committee.

An open meeting of the Professional Ethics Committee where committee members and those interested in joining the committee, are invited to learn more about the extensive activities of the committee, provide feedback and collaborate about new ideas and initiatives

Can restructuring tools really save corporate entities, and if they can, at what price to the junior creditors? 
This panel will consider a number of different restructuring tools in a number of different jurisdictions and consider:

•    the use of reverse vesting orders;
•    how are assets transferred and liabilities compromised?;
•    the involvement of the courts;
•    the increasing use of cross cram down powers in restructuring plans;
•    how courts approach the sharing of the restructuring surplus;
•    treatment of “ out of the money” creditors;
•    treatment of junior creditors who object to restructuring proposals.

The panel will have speakers from a number of jurisdictions including Canada, South Korea, England, and the Netherlands who will comment on the restructuring tools in their jurisdictions.