BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Session events Calendar//IBA//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260424T202718Z
DTSTART:20241112T083000Z
DTEND:20241112T100000Z
SUMMARY:Should we prioritise collaboration or adversarial tactics when ne
 gotiating with regulatory enforcement authorities?
DESCRIPTION:This debate will examine the most effective approach to negot
 iation strategies with regulatory enforcement authorities\; specifically
 \, whether collaboration or adversarial tactics should be prioritised. A
 dvocates for collaboration argue that maintaining open lines of communic
 ation\, transparency and cooperation with regulatory agencies can lead t
 o more favourable outcomes\, including reduced penalties\, streamlined i
 nvestigations and improved compliance measures. On the other hand\, prop
 onents of adversarial tactics contend that taking a confrontational appr
 oach\, challenging regulatory interpretations and vigorously defending a
 gainst enforcement actions can protect organisational interests and pres
 erve legal rights. Through rigorous debate\, case studies and real-world
  examples\, the speakers will explore the advantages and disadvantages o
 f each approach\, considering factors such as legal risk\, reputational 
 impact and long-term relationship building with regulatory authorities. 
 Join us as we delve into the complexities of negotiation strategies with
  regulatory enforcement authorities and seek to identify the most effect
 ive path forward for organisations facing compliance challenges.
LOCATION:
UID:84a5f4d6-f5e0-4d0e-bd27-2b8da012aa69
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR